The first thing to consider is whether the case is best handled by one or three arbitrators. This evaluation should take place regardless of whether the arbitration agreement already specifies a number. It may well be that both sides will agree that while the arbitration agreement provided for three arbitrators, the matter is one in which a single arbitrator will be sufficient. There is much to be said for a single arbitrator, including lower cost, efficiency and ease of coordinating dates and hearing times. A single arbitrator may also be prepared to make a hard decision without his or her conclusion having to be softened or watered down in order to please the majority. On the other hand, there is a danger, particularly in large, complex cases, and in international cases, that if the single arbitrator gets it wrong there is no appeal. For this reason, as well as for cultural or business sensitivities, many international arbitrations have three arbitrators.
Judgment
The skills brought to an arbitration should centre around the ability to decide the dispute fairly, in a cost effective manner, based on the facts and law as presented. The attribute of “judgment” goes beyond simply having an open and balanced mind to the issues. It means the proven ability to decide complex legal and factual issues correctly. It requires an ability to focus on the real issues and decide the matter in accordance with the appropriate law. In some cases, the ability to properly decide a matter may come from experience in the particular field at issue, (for example the oil and gas industry), or it may come from experience in a particular area of law (such as investor/state arbitration). In other cases the ability to properly decide a matter may come from an individual’s aptitude and general experience in deciding international commercial arbitration cases. However it is attained, this ability is the primary attribute that should be investigated when choosing an arbitrator.
Personality and Character
It is important that the arbitrator have what has been referred to as “gravitas” or “presence”. That is, the ability to command respect from the co-arbitrators, counsel, witnesses and the parties. The candidate must also have a demonstrated track record for diligence, not only in organizing and conducting hearings but also in turning out the final written award. Combined with diligence is the ability to manage a caseload and in some circumstances, to be able to say no to new assignments when they interfere with present ones.
Checklist regarding Personal Attributes
Arbitration In Canada - Choosing an Arbitrator
-
TOPICS:
- ABOUT e-COURT
- home
- preliminary information
- introduction ( About us )
- scope of legal areas
- directorate
- supervisory board
- advisory council
- originating partners
- e-Court & ADRpartners
- articles of operation
- privacy
- legal information
- in the news
- ( e-Court versus ADR )
- COSTS
- ***introduction
- *** membership
- *** court fee
- *** escrow
- *** hearings costs
- *** attestation costs
- *** extrajudicial costs
- *** lawyer/counsel fees
- *** subsequent costs
- frequently asked questions
- OFFLINE NETWORKING
Endorsements ( 1/2000 + ):
- Patricia M. Swerhone
Waters and Associates, Barristers & Solicitors, Toronto - Kenneth J. Byrne
Immigration and Real Estate Lawyer at Benson Buffett, Newfoundland And Labrador - ( Endorsements continued.....)